stem cells.

When the subject of embryonic stem cell research comes up, there is sure to be a heated debate. Many people are weighing in on the argument, even if they are not clear on what both sides of the debate entail. Personally, I feel that the subject is not as clear as both sides would like us to believe. I do feel that the benefits of embryonic stem cell research could make dramatic advances on certain diseases that have had no hope for cure in the past. There are 100-150 million people who may benefit from the stem cell derived therapies and treatments coming from the research being done (Buzzle,2012). Embryonic stem cells provide researchers with a greater advantage in comparison to adult stem cells because embryonic cells are much easier to identify, isolate, and they can be purified with few problems. It is also easier to grow embryonic cells compared to adult cells.

Embryonic cells are harvested 5 to 7 days after conception. It is argued that at the stage of 5 to 7 days, the embryo is not developed enough to have a personal identity. (Buzzle,2012). Contrary to the people who disapprove of the use of embryonic cells, it is not the murder of an innocent baby. It is just a mass of cells at this point. Supporters of embryonic stem cell research believe that it can lead to cures for such diseases as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, heart disease, diabetes type 1, and spinal cord injuries. There are up to 5 more diseases that may also be benefited by this research. They include Lou Gehrig disease, lung disease, degenerative joint disease (arthritis), sickle cell anemia, and or failure(U.S. News, 2012). If there is even a slight hope that scientists can make progress in finding cures for these often deadly diseases, then I believe there should be no question that it can be beneficial to millions of people.
[Only admins are allowed to see this link]

stemcellstudy.ucsf.edu/